The Memorandum of Understanding on Circular Economy Between the European Commission and the National Development and Reform Commission of the People’s Republic of China, dated July 16th, 2018 (the “EU-China Agreement”) may be light on binding commitments, but is, nonetheless, a true watershed event on the path to a circular economy (CE) for a number of reasons:

− it may well be the first international agreement (excluding intra-EU initiatives) on CE, and certainly the most significant multi-state development since the  EU Action Plan;

− it brings the parties’ joint efforts on CE efforts within the larger EU-China 202 Strategic Agenda for Cooperation and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, making it easier to address as part of these broader commitments;

−  it identifies areas where cooperation is needed between the parties, including:

•   the design, planning and implementation of strategies, legislation, policies and “major initiatives” on CE matters;

•   product composition, including eco-design and eco-labelling;

•   standards for corporate participation in CE, such as extended producer responsibility and green supply chains;

•   environmental impacts such as chemicals, plastics and waste; and

•   CE finance

− finally, it’s existence implicitly, if not explicitly, recognizes that nations and international business must collaborate on CE to ensure its harmonization within existing global trade and commercial practices.

What remains to be seen, however, is how far countries are prepared to cede their independence in order to achieve tangible CE results.  This push for close collaboration may well come from the business community intent on maintaining international supply chains and sales channels which permits the merchantability of products across continents in the face of local recycling standards.

Resource recovery performance standards, including those considered “eco-design”, may well be achievable internationally with the influx of new design initiatives presently being unleashed.  Less certain will be agreements on product content and sourcing, which may divide markets between sustainability goals and costs.

For now, the EU-China Agreement can be appreciated for what it stands for – a significant initial step towards the internationalization of CE.

____

For further information, please contact Jonathan Cocker:

jonathan.cocker@bakermckenzie.com

416-865-6908

Author

Jonathan D. Cocker heads Baker McKenzie’s Environmental Practice Group in Canada and is an active member of the firm's Global Consumer Goods & Retail and Energy, Mining and Infrastructure groups. Mr. Cocker provides advice and representation to multinational companies on a variety of environmental and product compliance matters, including extended producer responsibilities, dangerous goods transportation, GHS, regulated wastes, consumer product and food safety, and contaminated lands matters. He assisted in the founding of one of North America’s first Circular Economy Producer Responsibility Organizations and provides advice and representation to a number of domestic and international industry groups in respect of resource recovery obligations. Mr. Cocker was recently appointed the first Sustainability Officer of the International Bar Association Mr. Cocker is a frequent speaker and writer on environmental issues and has authored numerous publications including recent publications in the Environment and Climate Change Law Review, Detritus – the Official Journal of the International Waste Working Group, Chemical Watch, Circular Economy: Global Perspectives published by Springer, and in the upcoming Yale University Journal of Industrial Ecology’s special issue on Material Efficiency for Climate Change Mitigation. Mr. Cocker maintains a blog focused upon international resource recovery issues at environmentlawinsights.com.